3 New Messages
Digest #4529
| |
Messages
Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:56 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Naveed Ahmad" naveedbs
hi,
anybody preparing for MCTS 70-667 Exams and want to do group study with me,
please add me to their skype: nav.rak.
regards,
-navi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Peter Brunone <peter.brunone@gmail.com >wrote:
> **
>
>
> Based on my limited understanding of the situation, it sounds like a job
> for a content type.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:13 PM, brother.gabriel <brgabriel@sspx.org >
> wrote:
>
> > Oh man. This one is a doosie.
> >
> > I have to create a sort of report for our priests to fill out.
> >
> > In our portal, we have a site called "chapels", and branching from it are
> > subsites, one for each of our 100 chapels. Each chapel-site is
> > security-trimmed to only allow the priests of that chapel to enter.
> >
> > I want to deploy this report on each of the 100 chapel sites (so that it
> > inherits the chapel-site level security), but still be able to add and
> edit
> > the questions later. If I have to make an edit, I really don't want to do
> > that for 100 lists.
> >
> > What can I do here?
> > Remember, I have Sharepoint Enterprise 2010, with admin everywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Moderated by Mindsharp, www.mindsharp.com > Know More. Do More.Yahoo!
> > Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
--
0332-8057314
-*Navi*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
anybody preparing for MCTS 70-667 Exams and want to do group study with me,
please add me to their skype: nav.rak.
regards,
-navi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Peter Brunone <peter.brunone@
> **
>
>
> Based on my limited understanding of the situation, it sounds like a job
> for a content type.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:13 PM, brother.gabriel <brgabriel@sspx.
> wrote:
>
> > Oh man. This one is a doosie.
> >
> > I have to create a sort of report for our priests to fill out.
> >
> > In our portal, we have a site called "chapels", and branching from it are
> > subsites, one for each of our 100 chapels. Each chapel-site is
> > security-trimmed to only allow the priests of that chapel to enter.
> >
> > I want to deploy this report on each of the 100 chapel sites (so that it
> > inherits the chapel-site level security), but still be able to add and
> edit
> > the questions later. If I have to make an edit, I really don't want to do
> > that for 100 lists.
> >
> > What can I do here?
> > Remember, I have Sharepoint Enterprise 2010, with admin everywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------
> >
> > Moderated by Mindsharp, www.mindsharp.
> > Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
--
0332-8057314
-*Navi*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:01 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Dick Penny" dick_penny
On site I am working on, check-in makes it available for anyone to view.
So why would I even see the "publish" button if none of the
approval/archival/destruction mechanisms
are being used?
Dick Penny
So why would I even see the "publish" button if none of the
approval/archival/
are being used?
Dick Penny
Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:24 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Meryem Burduroglu" meryemburduroglu
Only members of the site with contribute rights will see your changes you "Checkin". It's not until you "Publish" visitors with read rights get to see them.
________________________________
From: Dick Penny <d_penny@usa.net >
To: sharepointdiscussions@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:01 PM
Subject: [sharepointdiscussions] Re: checkin vs publish for enterprise wiki\'s
On site I am working on, check-in makes it available for anyone to view.
So why would I even see the "publish" button if none of the
approval/archival/destruction mechanisms
are being used?
Dick Penny
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
____________
From: Dick Penny <d_penny@usa.
To: sharepointdiscussio
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:01 PM
Subject: [sharepointdiscussi
On site I am working on, check-in makes it available for anyone to view.
So why would I even see the "publish" button if none of the
approval/archival/
are being used?
Dick Penny
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE
Moderated by Mindsharp, www.mindsharp.com > Know More. Do More.
No comments:
Post a Comment