4 New Messages
| |
Messages
Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:12 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"catisbell01" catisbell01
Current formula being used is =DATEDIF(Due,
Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:21 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Cheetham, Phillip" phillip_cheetham
From: sharepointdiscussio
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:43 PM
To: sharepointdiscussio
Subject: [sharepointdiscussi
I need to create a calculated column using the DATEDIF. The problem comes from if the item is completed before the due date it creates a negative number. This is fine except that Sharepoint view the negative number as an error. #NUM!. How can I create the calculated column to show me the negative numbers. I use these to track metrics to see if we are ahead of schedule.
Current formula being used is =DATEDIF(Due,
------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:01 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Catherine Isbell" catisbell01
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Cheetham, Phillip <
phillip.cheetham@
> **
>
>
> This works in Excel:
> =IF(MIN(Due,
>
> From: sharepointdiscussio
> sharepointdiscussio
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:43 PM
> To: sharepointdiscussio
> Subject: [sharepointdiscussi
>
>
> I need to create a calculated column using the DATEDIF. The problem comes
> from if the item is completed before the due date it creates a negative
> number. This is fine except that Sharepoint view the negative number as an
> error. #NUM!. How can I create the calculated column to show me the
> negative numbers. I use these to track metrics to see if we are ahead of
> schedule.
>
> Current formula being used is =DATEDIF(Due,
>
> ------------
> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
> pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
> solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
--
Catherine Isbell
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:12 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"deanl1440" deanl1440
--- In sharepointdiscussio
>
> Our webmaster is frustrated with the SP 2010 OOB deployment process for moving our publishing site content changes from a Dev box to a Stage box and finally to the production box. In other words, he is not pleased with how long it takes for a change made on page X on the development instance of our public site to actually being able to see it in production.
>
> He feels that the overall process (even using Quick deploy) is actually cumbersome and unnecessary in our particular environment. He would like to be able to manage content changes directly in the production system.
>
> It seems to me from what I have seen and read regarding working directly on a production system is risky.
>
> Can anyone help me communicate the risks for Sr. management and / or if I am wrong and it is no big deal to do this kind of work directly on a production box, please let me know that too. Maybe I need to back off? Thanks for any counsel you can give and / or experiences you may have had with a similar situation!
>
> Ken
>